Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Style or Substance?

  1. #1
    Inactive Member ThomasB's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 17th, 2000
    Posts
    171
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Both of it works. Style with no substance / Substance with no style.

    If I'd have to chose I'd go for style with no substance, because substance with no style tends to bore me...

    Sure, best would be a nice mix of both aspects.

    Did this help? I doubt it smile

    ------------------
    ThomasB
    http://www.biennavista.com

  2. #2
    Inactive Member Jim Bird's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 2nd, 2001
    Posts
    108
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Hi,

    There are four things, you must remember.

    1. Educate.
    2. Inform.
    3. Shock.
    4. Entertain.

    You are not required to use all of them in the same movie, some people have been known to leave them all out.

    However, I can't remember those films! for some strange reason?

    As far as style goes, you have ether got it or you ain't.


    Jim Bird.


    [This message has been edited by Jim Bird (edited December 12, 2001).]

  3. #3
    Inactive Member twister!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    June 24th, 2001
    Posts
    1,034
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Cool

    The age old question...

    Both are important but substance is DEFINITELY of greater importance than style.

    Styles come and go like the changing weather. However, a work with substance will withstand the changing climate. Just look around you for the evidence.

    ------------------

  4. #4
    Inactive Member nate_dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2001
    Posts
    115
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Which is more important? There has been very few shorts which have a total original idea which I will remember. And the styles are mostly knock-offs of Tarantino movies. There is nothing worse than a movie you forget in one nights sleep.

    ------------------
    I LOVE THE SMELL OF NAPALM IN THE MORNING

  5. #5
    Inactive Member Matt J Heaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 28th, 2000
    Posts
    430
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Personally I'd go for both. But define style. Personally I get bored with movies such as Matrix with all their flashy effects. I forgot everything about that movie by next morning.

    But I consider a movie such as JFK to have style, as well as the obvious substance.

    ------------------

  6. #6
    Inactive Member Jim Bird's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 2nd, 2001
    Posts
    108
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Hi,

    Is substance another name for content?


    Jim Bird.

    ------------------

  7. #7
    Inactive Member BlackArtsProductions's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 26th, 2001
    Posts
    50
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    is this really a worth while question?

    ------------------
    I told him not to jump...so he didn't. Damn! Don't you hate anti-climaxes.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member Thousanth's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 2001
    Posts
    405
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Substance and Syle are equally important. You'll likely forget a stylish film that lacks any intresting content. Whereas films with substance and little visual style bore you to the point where you don't give a damn anymore.


    ------------------
    "Welcome to the Black Lagoon - Please wipe your feet."

  9. #9
    Inactive Member BuBu's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 29th, 2001
    Posts
    85
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    let me put the record straight: GOOD Substance or GOOD stlye? i assume thats what you meant? well it doesn't matter as long as you have one of them.

    ------------------

  10. #10
    Inactive Member Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 13th, 2001
    Posts
    160
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I personally think Matrix had a lot of substance, but people get so used to criticizing special effects movies that they just automatically rag on it. Matrix had a great and well thought out story.

    ------------------

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •